Top person sorted by score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)³ log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 261 Vladimir Volynsky 1 48.6527 262 Lucas Brown 7 48.6511 263 Dawid Kwiatkowski 5 48.6448 264 Johnathan Chu 6 48.6353 265 Yuki Mizusawa 6 48.6166 266 Dennis R. Gesker 1 48.6097 267 Rene Schick 6 48.6073 268 William de Thomas 4 48.6019 269 HansJürgen Bergelt 6 48.6000 270 Karsten Freihube 2 48.5803 271 Arnaud Jacques 6 48.5774 272 Alexander E. Baranchikov 3 48.5720 273 Andres Rojas 5 48.5538 274 Michael Kwok 10.3334 48.5355 275 Paul Vanderveen 5 48.5319 276 Robert Heindl 4 48.5317 277 Seiya Tsuji 2 48.5020 278 Håkan Lind 3 48.4911 279 Alan E. Monroe 4 48.4882 280 Jacob Eikelenboom 1 48.4840

move up list ↑

move down list ↓

Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)³ log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)³ log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n ^. log log n ^. log log log n )

operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)³ log log n ).

Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)³ is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).