Top person sorted by score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)³ log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 301 Howard Gordon 1 48.2938 302 Jonathan Drake 4 48.2838 303 Hirohito Yagi 2 48.2823 304 Carl Moudy 4 48.2625 305 Carlos Loureiro 2 48.2569 306 Bill Michael 6 48.2550 307 Phil Deakin 5 48.2501 308 Christian Guilleminot 4 48.2470 309 Ben Ridgway 5 48.2290 310 Cédric Latge 4 48.2265 311 Edward Trice 4 48.2204 312 Andy Hedges 6 48.2179 312 primecrunch.com 6 48.2179 314 Jens Riemann 4 48.2154 315 Arne Sielemann 5 48.1918 316 Jan Haller 1 48.1783 317 Tsuyoshi Ohsugi 1 48.1767 318 Gary Bauer 4 48.1755 319 Yuhei Asano 4 48.1708 320 Hazel Victoria Campbell 6 48.1602

move up list ↑

move down list ↓

Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)³ log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)³ log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n ^. log log n ^. log log log n )

operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)³ log log n ).

Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)³ is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).