Top person sorted by score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)³ log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 901 Greg Nelson 1 46.3700 902 Jared Brandt 1 46.3671 903 JOHN DEWAR 1 46.3606 904 Roland Clarkson 1 46.3420 905 Gordon Spence 1 46.2958 906 John Cosgrave 2 46.2303 907 Jeppe Stig Nielsen 1.5 45.9883 908 Igor Bulba 0.5 45.9566 909 Stephen Kohlman 1 45.5941 910 Thomas Wolfram 1 45.4935 911 Václav Vinklát 1 45.4103 912 Peter Grobstich 2 45.1964 913 Darren Wallace 1 45.0979 914 Lasse Mejling Andersen 1 45.0970 915 Michael Mamanakis 1 45.0738 916 Yuma Hayashi 1 45.0172 917 Makoto Morimoto 3 45.0070 918 Bruno Courty 1 44.8751 919 Bart van Rooijen 1 44.6614 920 Peter Doggart 1 44.5483

move up list ↑

move down list ↓

Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)³ log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)³ log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n ^. log log n ^. log log log n )

operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)³ log log n ).

Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)³ is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).