Top person sorted by score

The Prover-Account Top 20
Persons by: number score normalized score
Programs by: number score normalized score
Projects by: number score normalized score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)3 log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rankpersonprimesscore
361 Rob Powell 3.5 47.9364
361 Robert Anthony Lawrence 3.5 47.9364
363 Damian Szeluga 0.3333 47.9359
363 Bartosz Kupidura 0.3333 47.9359
365 Mike Kinney 4 47.9232
366 Randy Sundquist 1 47.9205
367 Robert Lacroix 3 47.9178
368 Jason Jung 3 47.9140
369 Guo Hua Miao 2 47.9130
370 Robert Michael Andrews 3 47.9126
371 Nicholas Mohacsy 2 47.9088
372 Lukasz Piotrowski 3 47.8935
373 Vadim Bulanov 3 47.8865
374 Hendrik Schawe 4 47.8864
375 Sean Matheis 3 47.8839
376 David Yost 5 47.8836
377 René Dohmen 2 47.8794
378 David Tomecko 1 47.8758
379 Karl Burridge 1 47.8753
380 Donald Hatland 2 47.8702

move up list ↑
move down list ↓

Notes:


Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)3 log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)3 log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n . log log n . log log log n )

operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)3 log log n ).

Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)3 is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).

Printed from the PrimePages <t5k.org> © Reginald McLean.