Top person sorted by score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)³ log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 641 W. Walter Fergusson 1 46.8794 642 Vince Mendrik 1 46.8783 643 Norbert Schneider 1 46.8749 644 Joshua Morgan 1 46.8729 645 David Chapman 1 46.8725 646 Paul van den Berg 1 46.8706 647 Joakim Kilströmer 1 46.8706 648 Peter Tibbott 1 46.8693 649 Zizhe Wang 1 46.8646 650 Bartłomiej Kobrzyński 1 46.8636 651 Joseph Wang 1 46.8634 652 Russell Mathers 1 46.8603 653 Kari Hyvönen 1 46.8591 654 Konstantin Manz 1 46.8547 655 Fabrice Le Foulher 1 46.8541 656 William Finn 1 46.8514 657 Vincent Riva 1 46.8491 658 David Walling 1 46.8464 659 Darin Loucks 1 46.8433 660 Sam Slade 1 46.8424

move up list ↑

move down list ↓

Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)³ log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)³ log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n ^. log log n ^. log log log n )

operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)³ log log n ).

Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)³ is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).